Billy D.
832cda34bd
- Add AGENT-ONBOARDING.md for AI agents - Add ARCHITECTURE.md with full system overview - Add TECH-STACK.md with complete technology inventory - Add DOMAIN-MODEL.md with entities and bounded contexts - Add CODING-CONVENTIONS.md with patterns and practices - Add GLOSSARY.md with terminology reference - Add C4 diagrams (Context and Container levels) - Add 10 ADRs documenting key decisions: - Talos Linux, NATS, MessagePack, Multi-GPU strategy - GitOps with Flux, KServe, Milvus, Dual workflow engines - Envoy Gateway - Add specs directory with JetStream configuration - Add diagrams for GPU allocation and data flows Based on analysis of homelab-k8s2 and llm-workflows repositories and kubectl cluster-info dump data.
72 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
72 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# [short title of solved problem and solution]
|
|
|
|
* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | superseded by [ADR-NNNN](NNNN-example.md)]
|
|
* Date: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
* Deciders: [list of people involved in decision]
|
|
* Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL]
|
|
|
|
## Context and Problem Statement
|
|
|
|
[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
|
|
|
|
## Decision Drivers
|
|
|
|
* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
|
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
|
|
|
|
## Considered Options
|
|
|
|
* [option 1]
|
|
* [option 2]
|
|
* [option 3]
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
|
|
|
|
## Decision Outcome
|
|
|
|
Chosen option: "[option N]", because [justification. e.g., only option which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force | … | comes out best (see below)].
|
|
|
|
### Positive Consequences
|
|
|
|
* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
|
* …
|
|
|
|
### Negative Consequences
|
|
|
|
* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
|
|
* …
|
|
|
|
## Pros and Cons of the Options
|
|
|
|
### [option 1]
|
|
|
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …]
|
|
|
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
|
|
|
### [option 2]
|
|
|
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …]
|
|
|
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
|
|
|
### [option 3]
|
|
|
|
[example | description | pointer to more information | …]
|
|
|
|
* Good, because [argument a]
|
|
* Good, because [argument b]
|
|
* Bad, because [argument c]
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->
|
|
|
|
## Links
|
|
|
|
* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
|
|
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
|